C. E. White said:
On that particular 5.4 the filter was remotely mounted behind the front
bumper and horizontal. I never had the problem when changing oil, but then I
never changed oil when the vehicle was stone cold and the outside
temperature was 10 degrees. Cold oil is more viscous, and therefore it takes
longer build pressure.
Where did you acquire that myth. Assuming you don't have some not
approved oil with a high pour point in your engine the oil pressure
should start to rise as soon as you start cranking the engine. And the
colder it is the faster it will rise. When it is really cold out the oil
pressure will often reach normal levels before the engine even is
running. Oil is not compressible. So unless you have air in the system
between the pump and pressure sending unit the pressure signal from pump
to oil pressure sensor should be pretty much instantaneous. It sounds
like you have a problem no matter what filter you use, but Ford has
somehow convinced you you are magically protected if you use their
filter.
Also, when I change the oil, I doubt the oil pump has
any problem losing prime. Not so sure about the situation when the oil leaks
back through the anti-drain back valve overnight.
Maybe it was not the anti-drain back valve, but the Ford mechanic emphasized
the need to use an FL-820S Filter on the engine instead of the older FL820
or any other filter that did not use a silicone anti-drain back valve. The
only noticeable difference between a FL820 and FL820S filter is the
anti-drain back valve material (the "s" uses a silicone anti-drain back
valve instead of nitrile).
And finally, I never had the problem when using an FL820S oil filter (more
than 120,000 miles after the time I had the noise). I certainly can't say
for sure the oil filter was the casue of the concern, but it seems Ford when
to a lot of trouble to update the FL820 filter to include a better
anti-drain back valve. I can't imagine Ford spending an extra penny for
something that was not beneficial.
You need to really start looking at something other than hobgoblins as
an explanation for how things work. If Ford can spend an extra penny per
filter to convince you to not look for the defect in their engine and
instead make you believe you are magically protected then yes it is
money well spent from their point of view.
Here is my experience with the Chrysler slant six engine: In the early
70's I worked at a place where we had 3 dodge vans with slant six
engines. In the 3 years I worked there never had a problem with any of
these engines except one - when it got down to -25F they would often
need to be jump started to get them going. I talked to a friend of mine
who worked as a fleet mechanic. He had experience with lots of these
engines (and yes they used Fram filters where he worked also).
He said the trick to starting these engines when its really cold is to
crank the engine until the oil light goes out. That usually takes about
2 seconds when it is really cold. When the oil light goes out stop
cranking and sit and wait until the oil light comes back on. then wait
a few more seconds and then repeat the procedure. At the second or 3rd
attempt the engine should start.
Well I tried it and by-golly it worked. Never had to jump one those
engines again even when the thermometer went down to -32F. And these
engines all had Fram filters
So excuse me if I don't believe the internet folklore about these
engines failing to build oil pressure. I know from personal experience
that never happened with a properly functioning engine. I don't care
how many times somebody has had tear down an engine apart for oil
related failures. That doesn't tell me that a bogeyman caused the
problem that made those engines fail. What it tells me is those were
badly maintained malfunctioning engines. The slant six was one of the
most bullet proof engines Detroit ever built. When they were properly
and well maintained there would never be any good reason to dig any
deeper into these engines than removing the valve covers.
-jim