I don't understand why everyone in the US fights such a system so
much. I remember when Florida was supposed to get a high-speed train
system to connect all the major cities. It would have been wonderful!
But the governor did a good job and making sure it wouldn't happen
DESPITE the people having VOTED for it (gotta LOVE democracy at work
here)!
The US would truly be the perfect place for this. You have huge, long
distances that are perfect for those trains capable of going 200 miles
per hour. Beats sitting in 70mph congested highway traffic, doesn't
it?
You could reduce the distance between say Florida and New York, which
is a common route for many people, to less than half the time it takes
by car.
I just don't understand why it is not done.
The thing that I find europeans tend not to "get" about the US is just
how spread out it is. I live in a major city with fairly good local
bus and train service. I can catch a commuter train to the town where
I work -- but then what? My place of business is about ten miles from
the town center, where the bus depot is. The local bus service can
get me to the nearest commercial area, but now I've taken two busses
and a train and *I'm still twenty minutes walk from work*. The
country was built on the assumption of car travel. Maybe not an
efficient design, but it has other advantages.
CLose as I can tell, Europe is a continent full of big cities with
*nothing at all* in-between. When europeans comment on the relative
state of US mass transit, they're thrown off by the fact that, even if
every US city had a great local mass transit system (and most of the
mhave pretty good ones already), and every city was connected by a
high-speed train line, this would *still not cover the majority of
people*.