L
Losiho
The manual tranny is ALWAYS driving all four wheels. The Automatic
isn't, it's only driving the front wheels on clean, dry pavement.
Bullshit.
The manual tranny is ALWAYS driving all four wheels. The Automatic
isn't, it's only driving the front wheels on clean, dry pavement.
Felix said:One thing that has always stuck with me was that in my youth, I can
remember always being able to push start a manual transmission vehicle
with a dead battery and get it going. I haven't done that in many
years, but I seem to have always needed it to happen to every one of
my manual tranny cars that I have owned at least once in their
lifetimes.
Bonehenge said:Go ahead, tell us how it all works.
Felix said:Thanks to all. At the time of purchase last month, the dealer had the
manual RS 2.5 in stock, but I was reading literature on automatics at
the dealer and the marketing dep't at SOA seems to really stress the
difference between the manual's simple 50-50 split and use a lot of
fancy words (to me) to describe the way the automatic works. They made
the automatic seem far superior to something that's stuck in a simple
50-50 ratio.
Subject: Re: Automatic vs. Manual
From: "Yousuf Khan" <(e-mail address removed)>
Newsgroups: alt.autos.subaru
I doubt that the manual gets better gas mileage than the automatic. First of
all, these days, all automatics have lock-up torque converters, which
effectively eliminates inefficiency of the slippage in the torque converter.
Second, I get the feeling that the manuals are setup more for performance
than fuel efficiency. At 60mph, my 5 speed OBW 2.5L is rotating at around
3000rpm in 5th, when it should be doing 2500rpm or less in most other cars.
Yousuf Khan
Go ahead, tell us how it all works.
Barry
Even when manuals do better on paper, you'd have to be living in a
retirment home in Florida to get those better numbers in real life.
Who's going to consistanly shift at 3500 rpm when there's 3000 more to
use on the tach.
uglymoney said:I shift before 3000 rpm all the time, if I am driving for mileage that
is.
Yousuf Khan is right about the final drive. 5th turns too fast on the
highway. Its a shame.
Losiho said:No Bazza, you can to the Subaru website yourself and read up on it
(Subaru Australia's website has a detailed description). In case
you're wondering, the static ratio is 60/40 front to rear for my
Outback. If the static ratio delivers at least 40% drive to the rear
wheels, then how can you say it's "front wheel drive" on clean dry
pavement ?
Depending on the market and model, it looks as if Subaru gives the front or
rear bias a different ratio. Most of the heavier cars, such as the Legacies
and Legacy Outbacks have a 90:10 front/rear ratio. I think the WRX automatic
came with a 60:40 front/rear. And apparently the Australian models come with
that reversed to 40:60.
AUSTRALIA
David... can u explain, for us non-techno's, the terms you are using
please?? And possibly, if anyone can, a bit of a descriptive as to HOW
these functions work???
VDC = ??? Viscous Distribution Control ???
VTC = ??? Variable Traction Control ???
Bonehenge said:I agree with you on everything but the mileage.
Many automatic Subies get equal or better gas mileage than the manual
Felix said:the dealer and the marketing dep't at SOA seems to really stress the
difference between the manual's simple 50-50 split and use a lot of
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.