R
Rick Courtright
B said:I stand by the moron comment.
Hi,
I'm with you 100%, but there are those who just don't (or won't) get it.
On the Internet, you can be anyone you want to be, and SOMEBODY will
take you seriously! As I mentioned above about teaching pigs to sing...
I don't think Subaru has yet reached this level of "technical
limitation" for lack of a better term, but this thread reminds me of a
certain GM/Chevy gearbox, used in some of their trucks just a few years
back. It spec'ed a synthetic oil and there was a GM part no. on the
"warning" tag on the gearbox. GM used TWO synthetic oils one year,
depending on which run of gearboxes the trucks had. Both had the same
weight rating, etc., just different part no's. One of the gearboxes, if
refilled using the wrong part no., would seize up within 150-200 miles!
(It happened to one of my clients--cost the shop that did the change
some bucks to replace his gearbox! Fortunately, it was a reputable shop,
not a "quickie" place, and they gave him no grief about it. The shop
manager told my client, as he apologized for the mistake, "I guess we
all went to school this week!")
So for those who think the "Uncle Scottys" (or "Bobistheoilguys") of the
world know more than the guys who do this stuff for a living, enjoy your
playing! Personally, I'll show a bit of respect for the guys who "wrote
the book" and the work they put into it, conspiracy theories
notwithstanding.
Rick