I can attest that my Ohio-made '99 Accord EX V-6 seemed very well screwed
together. I only kept it until just under 60K miles, but had only one
problem: the CD changer died; and I'd say that's not the fault of the Ohio
assemblers.
On the other hand, my Japanese-made '93 Honda Prelude had a bad manual
transmission (grinding in gear shifts). Dealer tried to fix it with some new
parts; didn't work. Finally I insisted on a brand-new, still-shrinkwrapped,
Made-in-Japan, complete transmission, and that did the trick. At the time
Preludes were considered even more reliable and trouble-free than Accords. I
got the one that wasn't.
Aren't some of the top JD Powers initial quality surveys showing Buick as
the winner?
I still would tend to believe the Japanese-assembled cars will excel. My
Forester XT is a Japan-assembled car; our new '06 Legacy was made by
Hoosiers. I guess I can run an experiment. I'll get back to you in a few
years.
You pays your money and takes your chances, from wherever.
HW