N
nothermark
I never see the fat women in the SUV's towing anything around here. It
appears more like it's the only thing that they would really fit in.
No arguement from me. ;-)
I never see the fat women in the SUV's towing anything around here. It
appears more like it's the only thing that they would really fit in.
KLS said:Yes, and driving an SUV now is almost a guarantee that the driver will
get into an accident of some sort, viz. the New York Times article
from last year (was it?), because of their arrogance and careless
evaluation of the risks of the road.
lkreh said:The SUV
worked well for the Germans, but I think the Tribeca is too little, too
late. I'm one of the majority who like it, but wouldn't buy it.
What would you buy if you had two or three teenagers to haul around?
I think it was the New Yorker Magazine.
What I'm wondering is if it would be worth starting a collsion shop
specializing in all these crunched SUV's. ;-)
On Tue, 26 Jul 2005 11:50:17 -0400, Tom Reingold
Neither one would let truth mess with poltical views.
What I'm wondering is if it would be worth starting a collsion shop
specializing in all these crunched SUV's. ;-)
vehicles that only improve as the years wear on. <<
Fine for boy racers and those who desire high performance.w/o
practicality. Tow with and STi? Not recommended. Roof rack? Have to
buy it. Carry large loads? No. I'm glad they sell the Sti but to me
But the name is the same and the commercial makes the vehicle seem
wimpy. I wouldnt buy any vehicle with a ridiculous name like that.
It isn't wise to name a car after a part of a cesspool of a city that
is filled with deviants. Most of America has Christian values and
finds that behavior an abomination. The museums are really the only
worthwhile thing in NYC. A car name should be neutral or express a
positive connotation.
Tom said:I thought Christians believe in loving thine enemy as thyself, but what
do I know?
nothermark said:That why I see so many women driving them? And I really do around
here. They are conceived as a safer vehicle for the occupant. They
are also conceived to be what one needs when it snows. if I wanted to
pick the truley macho assholes it wouldbe Volvo drivers.
The idea that men who use anything powerfull are compensating for
sexual inadequacy is just so much psychobabble that has droped into
the mass intellect. It is not true in most cases. On the other hand
by that reckoning I guess I must be really macho as I spend all day
driving around in a Hyundai Accent. ;-)
KLS said:Yes, and driving an SUV now is almost a guarantee that the driver will
get into an accident of some sort, viz. the New York Times article
from last year (was it?), because of their arrogance and careless
evaluation of the risks of the road.
nothermark said:What would you buy if you had two or three teenagers to haul around?
Ray said:Talk about a sensitivity issue. I didn't see a huge groundswell of
public opinion when the KIA first came on the scene. To me KIA means,
and always will mean, Killed In Action. Didn't Chevrolet have a image
problem with the Nova in Spanish speaking countries?
And I'm sure that you formed that opinion from having read the NY Times
and The New Yorker extensively, right?
Actually, that's a cheap trick, to discredit the source rather than
argue the merits of what is written.
I read the article called "GOD AND COUNTRY --A college that trains young
Christians to be politicians" and found it to describe a scary trend. I
showed the article to a conservative Christian, and he loved the article
and thought tha that it described a wonderful thing. He found no bias,
and neither did I. It lays the facts out so the reader can decide.
Try it. The article is at
http://www.newyorker.com/fact/content/articles/050627fa_fact
Tom
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.