H
I live about 40 miles away in DE. If I had to drive the Sure KillLOL..why, you want to avoid me on the road??
I live in Philly, and debating whether to fill the hollow spaces
behind the bumper covers so the Sube doesn't get torn up bumpers and
busted tail lights like other cars, including my old Chevy, because
people can't judge when pulling out of parallel parking spots. Got
into an argument with a guy I know who said, You Have to hit the
bumpers, when I commented how many times his must have been hit,
because of all the missing paint on his rear bumpers, so I Guess He
stops After he hits them also. I try to avoid all contact, and most
people drive automatics. No wonder I want a 5M. I guess that was the
motivation to build a car that Parks Itself. Today's cars are SO good
they need Avoidance Radar. Night Vision I can see, so you don't hit
deer or moose in the dark, but Avoidance Radar?? A breathilizer
ignition switch should be First on the list of features.
VF
and I thought Restrictor Plates were what lowerd the speeds. Learn
something new every day.) ) )
Called Ins co today for premiums, and thay asked if the car had ABS
and air bags. Yes.. & Yes..)) Odd that they want you to have them but
they Claim they don't help. Oh, well...
houndman@[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must like air bags and ABS. Not Me!!
I'm sure all the guys who dislike ABS think they can brake more
effectively in an emergency situation.
Betcha only, oh, I'll be generous--maybe 10% actually can.If ABS wasn't an advantage, it wouldn't be illegal in certain racing
bodies. <G>
I can probably cadence brake to a standstill in a shorter distance than an
ABS system can stop the same car in the same conditions *BUT* there's not a
lot in it and more importantly I can't steer at the same time without ABS -
IMO *that's* the advantage to the majority of drivers if they'd bother
learning how to use it effectively.
BTW, given that's the main advantage of ABS, whty the hell would anyone
disconnect it from the *front* wheels when they steer the car?
Maybe he shouldn't stop there. Why not revert to fwd and take out the air
conditioner, seatbelts, radials, disk brakes. Stuff it, why not just buy a
'26 Chev and be done with all this poofy modern stuff? Cheers
I live about 40 miles away in DE. If I had to drive the Sure Kill
Expressway every day in Philly, I'd use all the protection I could get.
Maybe even put in a roll bar
Frank
Also, I'd be packing.- Hide quoted text -
- Show quoted text -
There are other racing bodies besides NASCAR. Restrictor plates fit
fuel injected cars poorly.
Some race cars even turn right and left during every race, not just
once or twice a year.
writes:houndman@[EMAIL PROTECTED]
If ABS wasn't an advantage, it wouldn't be illegal in certain racingYou must like air bags and ABS. Not Me!!
I'm sure all the guys who dislike ABS think they can brake more
effectively in an emergency situation.
Betcha only, oh, I'll be generous--maybe 10% actually can.
bodies. <G>
I can probably cadence brake to a standstill in a shorter distance than an
ABS system can stop the same car in the same conditions *BUT* there's not a
lot in it and more importantly I can't steer at the same time without ABS -
IMO *that's* the advantage to the majority of drivers if they'd bother
learning how to use it effectively.
BTW, given that's the main advantage of ABS, whty the hell would anyone
disconnect it from the *front* wheels when they steer the car?
Maybe he shouldn't stop there. Why not revert to fwd and take out the air
conditioner, seatbelts, radials, disk brakes. Stuff it, why not just buy a
'26 Chev and be done with all this poofy modern stuff? Cheers
weeeell, pickups used to have ABS in Just the rear. May still. Figure
I can manage the fronts locking easier than the rears, and in a turn,
that lighter rear will be coming around if the rears lock.
26' Chevy eh? Lots of shows on recently about 32 Fords. I think they
looked similar. I'll give them a look see. No computers in them right?
I never wanted to see them again till the Prestolite CD unit I put in
a new car in 62' Quit after 6mo, at the top of a suspension bridge
going into NJ. I coasted down and off it, and disconnected it. Threw
it Off the bridge on the way home.))
VF
yea, but Rt & Lt hand turn races usually don't get to as high a speed.
AS said:AFAIK the procedure continues to be the same.
I would jump on the interstate but would change the speed up and down
from the 40 or so interstate minimun speed all the way to 70 or so,
avoiding a constant speed.
Gareth said:I agree with this completely. I would do this without turning the
engine off for about 100 miles. When you turn the car off, do an oil
change immediately. You will be amazed at how many metal shavings and
particles drain out. The rings are primarily set during this first
hundred miles. Do another dino oil change at about 1500 miles. At
about 5000 miles change over to fully synthetic. Change every 6000
thereafter.
An engine broken in this way will be very efficient during the course
of its life. Gas mileage, acceleration, etc.
Todd said:Subaru does not recommend such early oil changes. The car is shipped
with special oil apparently to aid in breakin.
Least that's what Iv'e read in more than a few places.
Maybe I am a cynic. Do manufactures want a car to last 300,000 miles, or
would they prefer you to buy a new one every 150,000 or so?
2007"Bonehenge (B A R R Y)" <DwightSchrute@[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Aug 23,
at07:56 PM
houndman@[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
You must like air bags and ABS. Not Me!!<snip>
Stuff it, why not just buy a
'26 Chev and be done with all this poofy modern stuff? Cheersweeeell, pickups used to have ABS in Just the rear. May still. Figure
I can manage the fronts locking easier than the rears, and in a turn,
that lighter rear will be coming around if the rears lock.26' Chevy eh? Lots of shows on recently about 32 Fords. I think they
looked similar. I'll give them a look see. No computers in them right?
I never wanted to see them again till the Prestolite CD unit I put in
a new car in 62' Quit after 6mo, at the top of a suspension bridge
going into NJ. I coasted down and off it, and disconnected it. Threw
it Off the bridge on the way home.))
Properly set up brake system with a decent proportioning valve would stop
the rears locking up unladen in the first place. Loaded it isn't a problem.
Same with suspensions about 80 years ahead of leaf springs so all the
wheels stay on the ground all the time in all condiitons.
ABS is bloody useful used as intended but it woun't suspend the laws of
physics. People trying to do a crash brake and 3 lane S swerve at 150Km/h
are going to come unstuck and quite probably fall over!
There used to be a guy in Sydney ran a 26 Chev as a taxi truck until at
least the mid 90s. Original owner and a miserable old coot. Some of the
very faded original paint was still on it with a fair bit of bare metal
and the absolute bare minimum spent on anything for at least 30 years.
Last time I saw it it was with a diferent owner fully restored but still
with a taxi truck plate.
Looked a bit like this one while in daily use!
http://www.stovebolt.com/gallery/lupton_si_1926.htm
Cheers
what's the latest theory on breaking them in? Last I remember was no
sustained high speeds for 1K mi, or something like that. May be
picking up a car 120mi away, and the Interstate would be quicker, but
I'm thinking secondary roads, and maybe stopping and letting it cool
down often. Don't need no head gasket blowing.(((
VF
Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?
You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.