Jim said:
What is the Subaru position regarding tires which are 6 years old?
Hi,
I don't know Subaru's position, but if you want to do some surfing,
you'll find the TIRE INDUSTRY'S position is pretty much this: if it's
six years old (or more) replace it, regardless of tread wear!
A friend, retired truck driver, blew a front tire on his motorhome a
coupla summers ago, driving across Kansas. Tire had few miles, but was
seven or eight years old. The RV had to be towed in because of both the
lost tire and extensive body damage from the "explosion." As the fellow
was replacing the tire, he told my friend the State of Kansas has (or
would soon have? Story wasn't clear), a law that tires must be replaced
at FIVE years on certain types of vehicles. Motorhomes were one of 'em!
My position? I can't remember the last time a set of tires lasted me
more than three years, but I've bought a couple of cars that had older
tires on them. It didn't matter what they looked like, first stop was
the tire shop because I have no idea how they were cared for or what
they hit, etc. And after a lady friend blew a five year old, only half
worn, tire going across the desert from here in SoCal to Phoenix
(fortunately it was winter--she had to go a lot further on the "donut"
than is recommended), I think the "time in service" issue is worth
considering. I don't make a lot of money, but still, my life's worth
more than the cost of a set of tires!
Rick