y_p_w said:
to work, and each one could do a plug and patch repair. I suppose
the plug reduces the flex at the hole. Tires are sealed against air
loss with an inner liner, and only a patch guarantees a proper seal.
Hi,
My understanding from casual research years ago is the purpose of the
plug is to seal the tire from external "attack" (in particular water)
while the patch guarantees air tightness. According to the sources I
read, water getting under the tread can cause rusting of the steel belts
and/or delamination between the tread and the carcass. The "rust"
problem seemed a little far fetched to me, since the steel is encased in
rubber material, but I won't argue yes or no on that front. The
delamination problem seems more likely, particularly as we go to more
"environmentally friendly" (read: may not work as well as the older
stuff???) bonding agents. I was told one of the prime suspects in the
original Firestone 500 radial delaminations (mid-'80s or so?) was
supposedly water-based bonding agents being compromised in tires that
had been punctured. I find that one easier to buy than the rust story.
Many mfrs today recommend (and, I understand, some states require)
replacement of radial tires at five year intervals regardless of wear
because of the potential for delamination as the bonding agents lose
their effectiveness (I'd have thought the vulcanization process during
mfr would override this, but I haven't kept up recent changes in auto
tire mfring technology to know what's still used, what's not. I
understand in some rubber mfring, "old style" vulcanization's being
replaced with less costly, and arguably less effective, methods)
One news report I saw on the subject indicated failure could even happen
on a tire that had lived its life as a spare, never previously on the
ground, when it was pressed into road service. I'd have taken that as an
"Oh, really?" kind of story requiring more data at first, but,
anecdotally, shortly after seeing this report, the g/f threw a tread on
a tire on her Civic--a hair over 20k miles, about half worn, never
punctured, but approaching five years in a rather warm environment. So
it would seem the change in bonding agents may be a more real problem
than originally thought. Because of that, I would think the RMA (Rubber
Mfrs' Assn or similar) would be pushing dealers to go the "plug and
patch" routine automatically, but at least here in SoCal, you'll
generally draw the "1000 yard stare" if you ask around.
I don't trust that a plug alone shot from the outside isn't going to
shoot off. Even if it doesn't, there's no way to make sure the glue
I wouldn't worry about "shooting out" if the plug is a mushroom head
design, but there's also the "rubber band" type plug that has no
shoulder anywhere. That one would be worse than worrisome to me! Either
way, I wouldn't trust ONLY a plug cuz of the sealing difficulties you
mentioned.
Rick