Hi Apu!
You are assuming that ALL take offs are sold with original rubber which
they don't. Most of them might be though. Why people get rid of their
perfectly good 16"ers beats me. Besides, the additional shipping cost for
92s is way smaller that what you'd pay for replacement rubber of any kind
(unless
you get tires that are WAY worse than RE92s and maybe even not then after
you add the cost of mounting and balancing).
On top of that tires mounted on 16" wheels is additional padding that could
offer additional protection during shipping. How's that?
A wise man once said " Would you rather get 20K miles out of a set of
tires that were a pleasure to drive on, or 40K out of a set that made
life miserable every time you sat behind the wheel?"
I _had_ hoped to at least autocross the life outta the stock RE92s on
my WRX, but they were just so bad that I couldn't stand it. I replaced
them with Kumho Ecstas on the stock wheels for autocross, and a set of
Michelin Alpin Pilots in 205/65 on 15 inch rally wheels for daily use
(I drive dirt a lot, and some offroad as well; hey it's a Subaru after
all ;-) at around 6-7K miles. Gave the RE92s to a highschool kid who
couldn't afford new rubber, and so was perfectly happy to get them.
FWIW, the Michelin ice tires actually proved to be as grippy, maybe
even grippier (but louder) on dry pavement than the RE92s. They also
offer far improved performance on dirt and gravel roads, and (no
surprises here) on snow and ice. Plus the taller tire has
consistently given slightly better mileage; 25-26 for the Alpin Pilot
vs 23-24 with the RE92s.
I have since been given a used set of the Michelin Arctic Alpins in
205/50/16. I only used these for a couple ice rally cross events last
winter, (a 1st and 3rd place finish in PGT) and perhaps a thousand
miles of daily driving, but feel that they work even better than their
higher priced relatives for all around use; definitely better on ice.
Tire wear is probably greater, tho.
As in all things, YMMV. For non-aggressive driving on mostly dry
pavement, the RE92s are adequate, and probably good for 30-40K miles;
they're round, they're rubber, and they hold air . . .
ByeBye! S.
Steve Jernigan KG0MB
Laboratory Manager
Microelectronics Research
University of Colorado
(719) 262-3101