New 2009 Forester Coming Spring of 2008 in USA

Looks like the mitsubishi outlander. Nothing to get excited about.
Subaru really needs to flush their design team and hire some new ones.
 
A little more horsepower and a bit more torque plus better gas mileage;
looks like improvements to me.

Still uses timing belt. I see no improvement in the 09 motor
 
Obviously, Big Jim should be purchasing something more closely engineered
to his liking. I might suggest he take a look at the new line of Massey-
Ferguson tractors. ;-)
 
The said:
Obviously, Big Jim should be purchasing something more closely engineered
to his liking. I might suggest he take a look at the new line of Massey-
Ferguson tractors. ;-)

or Zetor - they pull strong:


A.
 
http://www.subaru.com/sub/misc/2009/forester/index.html?cid=tr_2009_F...

Just got this in my email, thought others may be interested.

Blair

Thanks. I like it. Style tending towards the crossovers but only
minor.
I had a '98 which was totaled and replaced by an '03 and recently
bought an '08 f
or my wife. Only a discerning eye can tell the difference between
Forester model years
but improvements appear continuous and are under the hood. Forester
competition is
tending toward crossover vehicles, which to me look like hatchbacks.
Always liked
hatchbacks but do not prefer over SUV.

Frank
 
i can't wait ... here in AUS it is due in March

I see Subaru did away with the frameless windows, not a big fan of
them, I know some folks like them but, they were a problem for me on
my 2000 Forester
 
I see Subaru did away with the frameless windows, not a big fan of
them, I know some folks like them but, they were a problem for me on
my 2000 Forester


Can you really tell on the 2009?

I think Subaru has a winner here. The car looks very nice.

I love the panoramic windows, every car manufacturer
seems to follow the trend of building cars/suv's with these
ridiculous short or narrow windows, which make the car
look like a Loomis armoured vehicle, or some Hummer.

Brrrrr, the new 2009 Vibe and Scion are the ugliest examples:

http://www.autounleashed.com/photos/displayimage.php?pos=-212
http://brightcove.vo.llnwd.net/d3/u..._da3d83e6dac1ae770a8c77c74a5f3f6a434c356e.jpg

The Forester is one beautiful car.
I hope to be buying the 2009 one day.

M.J.
 
The vibe looks far nicer than the new subarus. The new subes are
designed by women for women
 
:. The new subes are designed by women for women

Well, if that is true, then ot seems from the pictures that
they've done a splendid job on that 2009 Forester, but if
you are a fan of childish comic-book like American styling
then by all means get a GM. A Monte Carlo, or an Impala,
or a Cobalt, or any Pontiac will do.. If you're into American
gangster themes get a Daimler-Chrysler product. If you're
a GI Joe kinda type the Hummer is the ultimate toy for you.

To each his own.

M.J.
 
No homo-phobic just homo-disgusted. There are cars for women. We need
some manly cars too.
 
M.J. said:
is useless, uncertain, and painful. And were it true, we
do not think all Philosophy is worth one hour of pain.

80. How comes it that a cripple does not offend us, but that a fool does?
Because a cripple recognises that we walk straight, whereas a fool
declares
that it is we who are silly; if it were not so, we should feel pity and
not
anger.

Epictetus asks still more strongly: "Why are we not angry if we are told
that we have a headache, and why are we angry if we are told that we
reason
badly, or choose wrongly"? The reason is that we are quite certain that we
have not a headache, or are not lame, but we are not so sure that we make
a
true choice. So, having assurance only because we see with our whole
sight,
it puts us into suspense and surprise when another with his whole sight
sees
the opposite, and still more so when a thousand others deride our choice.
For we must prefer our own lights to those of so many others, and that is
bold and difficult. There is never this contradiction in the feelings
towards a cripple.

81. It is natural for the mind to believe and for the will to love; so
that,
for want of true objects, they must attach themselves to false.

82. Imagination.--It is that deceitful part in man, that mistress of error
and falsity, the more deceptive that she is not always so; for she would
be
an infallible rule of truth, if she were an infallible rule of falsehood.
But being most generally false, she gives no sign of her nature,
impressing
the same character on the true and the false.

I do not speak of fools, I speak of the wisest men; and it is among them
that the imagination has the great gift of persuasion. Reason protests in
vain; it cannot set a true value on things.

This arrogant power, the enemy o


This is not me M.J., but some impostor quoting who knows what.

M.J.
 

Ask a Question

Want to reply to this thread or ask your own question?

You'll need to choose a username for the site, which only take a couple of moments. After that, you can post your question and our members will help you out.

Ask a Question

Members online

Forum statistics

Threads
14,674
Messages
69,634
Members
8,236
Latest member
karabean19

Latest Threads

Back
Top